logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

Trump’s Coal Plan Works for West Virginia

Via The Journal:

Earlier this week, the Environmental Protection Agency announced it followed through on President Donald Trump’s executive order to review and repeal the Clean Power Plan.

From its inception, the CPP was a total overreach of the federal bureaucracy. That’s why West Virginia led 24 states in fighting the rule in court, arguing that the Obama EPA overstepped its legal authorities under the Clean Air Act in proposing it. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed, and imposed a stay on the implementation of the CPP. Bipartisan majorities in both the Senate and the House of Representatives also passed legislation I introduced that would have voided the CPP. The rule survived, temporarily, only because of President Obama’s veto pen.

As many West Virginians know, the CPP was stacked against coal-fired generation. The plan would have choked off the development of new clean coal technologies and forced many existing coal plants to close. Had the plan been implemented, many more West Virginia miners, power plant workers, and employees in related industries would likely have lost their jobs. And our state’s economy, which is now on the mend, would be in a weaker position

Fortunately, under the leadership of President Trump, the EPA is ending the war on coal that was so devastating to our state.

While the Obama EPA failed to visit West Virginia to hear our concerns, the Trump EPA came to Charleston last year to hear from concerned citizens on both sides of the issue regarding replacement of the CPP. The comments received in that and other listening sessions informed the proposal released this week.

The Trump EPA’s proposed replacement plan, the Affordable Clean Energy rule, will focus on empowering individual states, putting an end to the era of one-size-fits-all plans. The proposal allows each state to issue a plan, plant by plant, to determine how each can reduce its emissions. Every plant doing what it can-considering its remaining useful life, the market’s need for its generation capacity, and what technologies are available and financially feasible-not only makes sense, but it ensures emissions reductions without the severe economic effects CPP would have imposed.

Think about it this way: Instead of some Washington bureaucrat demanding states upend their economies to meet unachievable regulatory standards, our states will work with the EPA to clean up our energy sector. This is the sort of federalist approach enshrined in the Constitution and our hallmark environmental statutes, including the Clean Air Act.

In addition to being rooted in law, this approach works: Since enactment of the Clean Air Act the emission of six priority air pollutants has been reduced by 73 percent, even while GDP has grown 2.5 times. Since 2010, carbon dioxide emissions in the United States have fallen by seven percent, even as global emissions have increased. All of this was achieved without the illegal approach of the CPP.

These achievements demonstrate that West Virginians don’t have to choose between a clean environment and a thriving economy. We demand both, and with this plan, both are achievable. The Trump administration’s plan allows West Virginia and other energy-rich states to pursue responsible emissions reduction while still providing reliable power at an affordable cost-power our national economy depends on.

We know that we can meet the economic and environmental challenges of tomorrow if we are given a fair fight. The Affordable Clean Energy proposal finally levels the regulatory playing field for West Virginia’s energy economy.

See the article here.

  • On August 27, 2018
Recent Coal in the News Posts
  • The EPA’s plan to break the electricity grid
  • No Energy Transition Without a Reliable Electric Power Grid
  • America faces chronic electricity shortages in push for renewable energy
  • The latest Biden energy crisis
  • Capito, Miller Introduce Bill to Block Implementation of EPA’s Power Plant Proposals
  • Opinion: Looming power shortages highlight flawed policy
  • Experts Warn of Grid Crisis as PA Senators Demand Green Energy
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
  • New U.S. Coal Capacity is Coming
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024