logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

It’s Past Time to Align Energy Policy with Energy Reality

Coal’s much-publicized decline isn’t a decline at all. Coal plant retirements in the U.S. and some parts of Europe have created a narrative that coal is in irreversible global retreat. The data tell a different story.

The oil and gas giant BP’s recently released annual Statistical Review of World Energy offers an important reality check on global energy use. BP’s chief economist, Spencer Dale, took a step back from the noise of yearly data to examine how the world’s mix of electricity generation has changed over the past 20 years. What he found might surprise you. It surprised him.

In 1998 coal generated 38 percent of the world’s electricity – the largest share – and 20 years on it generates… 38 percent, still the largest share. Coal is very much alive and kicking.

 

Maintaining is Growing

Global power consumption has soared over the past 20 years. For coal’s share of electricity generation to have held steady means that worldwide production and use of coal has grown – and grown significantly at that.

The surprise isn’t just limited to what has happened but also to what is happening. As the Financial Times’s Ed Crooks reported last week, coal consumption may be falling in the U.S. and Europe, and perhaps even in China, but overall its still growing.

“The International Energy Agency’s forecasts out to 2022, published at the end of last year, show projected declines in coal demand of 11m tonnes per year for China, 30m tonnes per year for European countries that are in the OECD, a club of mostly rich nations, and 37m tonnes per year for North America. Those declines are more than offset, however, by increases of 135m tonnes per year for India and 70m tonnes per year for the members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), which includes Vietnam.”

Crooks singles out Vietnam for good reason. Vietnam is pursuing renewable power to help meet its growing energy needs, but wind and solar are but a small part of the nation’s energy strategy. Coal – reliable, affordable and, thanks to advanced technology, increasingly clean – is the centerpiece of its plan to industrialize. Secure, on-demand, baseload power is what Vietnam needs to fuel its economy.

As Benjamin Sporton of the World Coal Association points out in Crooks story, many of the plants under construction in Asia are high efficiency, low-emissions (HELE). These ultra-efficient power plants are helping meet energy demand and address environmental concerns.

As we’ve discussed before, commercially available HELE technology – now being deployed all over the world – could be used to upgrade our coal fleet and help ensure we maintain a balanced, secure energy mix. But misguided politics and an energy marketplace unable to properly value fuel diversity and the reliability of baseload coal plants, remain steep hurdles.

As BP’s data analysis makes clear, global demand for coal isn’t going anywhere. The world’s appetite for baseload, dependable and secure energy continues to grow. It’s past time we marry U.S. energy policy with reality.

The U.S. possesses the world’s largest coal reserves and the world’s greatest capacity for technological innovation. Instead of fighting our resource abundance, we should be leading global efforts to develop and deploy advanced coal technologies. Our energy security, our economy and the world’s environmental goals might well depend on it.

  • On June 20, 2018
Recent Blog Posts
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
  • New U.S. Coal Capacity is Coming
  • Another Global Pivot to Coal?
  • A Global Energy Security Shock
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
  • New U.S. Coal Capacity is Coming
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024