logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

Letter: Only Coal Provides Reliable Power

Via The Virginian-Pilot:

TO MANY SKEPTICS, particularly those on the political left, the shutdown of coal plants has demonstrated the industry’s shaky future. With more than 400 units — more than one-third of the entire U.S. coal fleet — already shut down or due to close in the next few years, few places in the country will be untouched by the consequences of the loss of affordable and reliable electricity.

How can consumers avoid the serious stresses in the electric-power sector? What’s the safest way to provide the electricity needed to power households and keep businesses and factories running? What’s the safest way to endure electricity shortages that result in a cascading blackout or a brownout?

The power sector’s preference for a quick fix — its willingness to take hundreds of coal plants off the electric grid despite a risk to electricity reliability — is supposedly the answer. But it’s one that will result in serious problems with negative consequences for electricity users and the nation’s economy.

The problems were recently documented in an analysis conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Energy Technology Laboratory. It showed that coal was “the most resilient form of power generation” during the severe winter weather that hammered the eastern U.S. in December and January and that removing coal from the energy mix would “worsen threats to the electrical grid’s dependability” during future severe weather events.

The winter storm, known as a “bomb cyclone,” or winter hurricane, plunged the region into a deep freeze, sparking a significant increase in the demand for additional power for heat. Coal provided a majority of the power required to meet the emergency, according to the study. In fact, during the worst of the storm, U.S. electricity market experience showed that without the resilience of coal plants — the ability to add capacity — the eastern U.S. “would have suffered severe electricity shortages, likely leading to widespread blackouts.”

The report warns against overestimating the nation’s ability to respond to weather events if the current rate of coal plant shutdowns continues.

Focusing on six regional electricity markets administered by independent system operators that served areas affected by the bomb cyclone, it found that for the largest operator in the mid-Atlantic, coal provided the most resilient form of generation due to available reserve capacity and on-site availability, far exceeding all other sources, and providing three times the incremental generation from natural gas.

If nothing else, the shutdown of coal plants has made one thing clear: The notion that electricity reliability was unaffected was a sham.

Unless we stop coal shutdowns and start putting greater emphasis on reliability, electricity users will learn the hard way. But they aren’t the only potential victims. If power shortages force businesses and factories to close, companies would suffer financially, and shareholders would feel the effects.

Utilities, in other words, need to take another look at coal.

Syd S. Peng

Dept. of Mining Engineering

West Virginia University

Morgantown, W.Va.

See the article here.

  • On April 16, 2018
Recent Coal in the News Posts
  • The EPA’s plan to break the electricity grid
  • No Energy Transition Without a Reliable Electric Power Grid
  • America faces chronic electricity shortages in push for renewable energy
  • The latest Biden energy crisis
  • Capito, Miller Introduce Bill to Block Implementation of EPA’s Power Plant Proposals
  • Opinion: Looming power shortages highlight flawed policy
  • Experts Warn of Grid Crisis as PA Senators Demand Green Energy
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
  • New U.S. Coal Capacity is Coming
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024