logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

VA Lawmakers Block Funding for Climate Rule Compliance

Via E&E Publishing: 

Virginia’s General Assembly yesterday blocked funding for the state environment agency to work on ways of fulfilling a federal mandate to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

In a move decried by environmental groups, the Virginia House of Delegates yesterday pushed forward language in the state budget stating that the Department of Environmental Quality can no longer use state funding to prepare or submit a compliance plan for the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan “unless the stay issued by the United States Supreme Court is released.”

Under U.S. EPA’s Clean Power Plan, which was stayed by the Supreme Court in February, states are required to cut power-sector carbon emissions and submit compliance strategies detailing how they plan to achieve the reductions. Many states are debating whether to continue planning for the rule following the stay.

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) supports the Clean Power Plan. In March, he vetoed a bill Virginia lawmakers put forth requiring the General Assembly’s approval of the state compliance plan submittal for the EPA rule (ClimateWire, March 3).

The governor had proposed an amendment to remove the language in the budget barring the DEQ from spending state funds to comply with the Clean Power Plan.

“I strongly believe that Virginia needs to proceed with development of the regulations while a stay is in place,” the governor’s recommendation stated, adding “submission of such plan to the United States Environmental Protection Agency will not be authorized until the stay issued by the United States Supreme Court is released.”

But yesterday, the House of Delegates voted to override the governor’s amendment, meaning the state agency will be restricted from working on compliance with EPA’s climate rule as of July 1.

Michael Dowd, director of the Virginia DEQ’s air division, said in an email yesterday the agency still needs to meet with its attorneys and the governor’s office to determine the full impact of the budget language.

“Certainly, we won’t be putting pen to paper to draft a plan or start a regulatory process,” said Dowd. “With the stay in place, we are pretty limited on what we can do anyway, so it might not impact our work too much.”

A restriction or a ‘symbolic jab’?

Virginia environmental groups criticized the budget restriction, holding a protest outside the General Assembly yesterday morning wearing orange life vests and yellow rain boots.

Virginia Sierra Club director Glen Besa argued it’s “more than ironic” that Republicans in the General Assembly “would use the budget to block action on climate change when Virginia taxpayers are already spending millions to deal with sea-level rise.”

However, Natural Resources Defense Council attorney Walton Shepherd argued McAuliffe may be able to devise a workaround allowing his state to continue pursuing Clean Power Plan compliance. He called the budget language a “symbolic jab.”

“I just don’t think this is something that will stop the governor from moving forward,” said Shepherd. “By doing it through a budget restriction, it’s necessarily a very narrow action.”

Dominion Resources Inc., a major Virginia utility that recently made headlines for filing an amicus brief calling the Clean Power Plan’s goals “feasible,” declined to comment on the funding block.

“The budget issue is the purview of policymakers, the Governor, and the legislative process,” Dominion spokesman David Botkins said in an email.

McAuliffe’s office did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication.

Virginia’s Legislature is not the first state to restrict funding for its environment agency related to the Clean Power Plan.

Wyoming’s governor this spring signed a law prohibiting the state’s Department of Environmental Quality from spending money to plan for EPA’s climate rule, although it does allow the agency to “attend meetings and otherwise be informed as to any potential need to develop and submit a state plan” (ClimateWire, March 7). Missouri’s General Assembly is moving forward with a similar bill (ClimateWire, March 16).

See the article here.

  • On April 21, 2016
Recent Coal in the News Posts
  • The EPA’s plan to break the electricity grid
  • No Energy Transition Without a Reliable Electric Power Grid
  • America faces chronic electricity shortages in push for renewable energy
  • The latest Biden energy crisis
  • Capito, Miller Introduce Bill to Block Implementation of EPA’s Power Plant Proposals
  • Opinion: Looming power shortages highlight flawed policy
  • Experts Warn of Grid Crisis as PA Senators Demand Green Energy
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
  • New U.S. Coal Capacity is Coming
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024